Data Exhibits Explained

Data Exhibits

Narrative on the Data Exhibits for Rudolf Steiner College

 

This narrative has been created to update WASC of the factual corrections of the data submitted, to give the data its contextual framework and explicit explanations as needed, to offer the insights gained from gathering the data and reviewing it critically, as well as actions to be taken. In this area of institutional research the college has not, until recently, formalized a policy and procedure for maximizing the benefits of such annual studies. This has clearly become an area for improvement as we craft our process and follow the indicators for over all institutional development indicated by our data exhibits.

 

 

 

Data Exhibit Edits from Patrick Wakeford-Evans, Academic Dean and William Bento, Associate Academic Dean

 

The charts referred to in the following section are found at the end of this document

Chart 1.4: In year I, 2005 under section titled graduated for Consciousness Studies the number should read 10, not 1-.

Chart 1.5: Asterisks designate the numbers enrolled thus far with expectation of further enrollment by summer 2010. See attached data exhibit.

Chart 1.7: The last two rows designating single subject were reversed in original submission. Row of language is actually handwork and handwork is actually language. This was simply a clerical error in recording the data. There are no number changes on this chart.

Chart 1.9: Cohort 4 graduated 1 student.

Chart 2.0: The chart was inadequately constructed. It has been recreated to show the actual numbers of Full-Time Faculty, Part-Time Faculty, and Total Faculty (see revised chart included in appendix). In year 2 it showed a decrease of 2 male full time faculty members, but did not show the increase of 2 male part-time faculty member. A data entry error was placing a full-time faculty in the row of Hispanic when it belonged in Black, Non-Hispanic. In Year 3 the number for full-time faculty is 6 not 5. In Year 4 a female full-time faculty was added. These changes explain the new totals listed in the revised chart.

 

 

Data Exhibits – Context, Explanations, Insights & Actions To Be Taken:

 

Chart 1.1: Admissions activities by matriculated program

 

Context & Explanation

The total numbers increase of 26 from Year 1 to Year 2 is attributed to the first influx of matriculated students from the “Community Learning Centers” programs – programs providing the pre-requisite foundational courses for Waldorf Teacher Training. The loss of 11 students from Year 2 to Year 3 is due to the withdrawal of the “CLC” in Anchorage, Alaska. Reasons given for their withdrawal were the amount of time and work needed to fulfill the program requirements for a fledgling new school, and the fact that many of its teachers did not recognize the value of a Waldorf Teacher’s certificate. There was a normal attrition of 5 students from the Year 3 to Year 4.

In the Data Exhibits on the website the PDF form did not retain the hyperlinks that explained the asterisks. The asterisks identify the incompleteness of the data due to the fact that the summer enrollment has not been included in the data set.

 

 

 

Insights from Data

Enrollment numbers have decreased from Year 2 (2006-2007). The insight gleaned from this data leads to two concerning issues:

1. The continual economic hardship students are experiencing

2. The need for the college to offer more scholarship funding

Actions To Be Taken

It should be noted that in regards to the first concern listed above the college can only take into consideration the economic times we are going through in this nation and attempt to price our programs within comparable range of other small teacher’s colleges. As to the second and third concern actions have been taken in the Phase IV of the Strategic Plan, also submitted in the CPR documents.

The Academic Dean has made a resolve to instruct all Program Directors to write a narrative describing the reasons for attrition and/or decrease of enrollment in their prospective programs.

 

Chart 1.2: Admission by gender

 

Insight from Data

There has been a steady increase in male student applicants since Year 2 (2006-2007). Although reasons for this cannot be fully determined, it is a good sign for the state of Waldorf Education. The college faculty has also experienced an increase in male faculty. This may well be an influencing factor in the increase of male student applicants.

 

Chart 1.3: Admissions by race and ethnicity

 

 Context and Explanation

In year 2 (2006-2007) the increase of 14 Hispanic students can be attributed to the one-year Spanish Life Ways Program’s commencement. The decrease of 12 Hispanic students in the following year (2007-2008) can be partially attributed to the closing down of the foreign language program.

 

Insight from Data

The data confirms the continual draw the college has to international students who do not have Waldorf Teacher Trainings in their country. The lack of Black, Non-Hispanic students is quite reflective of the Waldorf School Movement as a whole.

 

Actions To Be Taken

Both above insights will be taken up as marketing/enrollment concerns in the Academic Affairs Committee and the Executive Committee for generative discussions that may inform and encourage the marketing/enrollment department to adopt strategies that can capitalize on the international prospects and seek out venues to introduce Waldorf Education to the African-American sector of our society.

 

Chart 1.4: Enrollment, retention, graduation by cohort group…certification

 

Context and Explanation

Designations of NA in Year 1 and 2 refer to the fact that the program was not offered in that year. In Year 3 and 4 of the Consciousness Studies program the graduated section of NA refers to the fact that no certificates were offered due to the overall consensus that it held no value for students in their professional status. 

 

Insight from Data

The Consciousness Studies program attracts students who wish to undergo self-development and gain ways to deepen their own interests. This is the rationale for why the certificates were not requested by students.

The Foundations in Anthroposophy program shows high retention, but low graduation rates. The reasons for this are that many students in the program are primarily concerned with attaining the core 18 credits needed for entry into the Waldorf Teacher’s Training program and not invested in the full 32 credits; and secondly, many students are satisfied with the completion of the courses but not inclined to finish the key assignments necessary for graduation.

Retention and graduation is consistently high in the full-time Waldorf Teacher Training (Preparation). It is a testament to the value and quality of this program.

 

Actions To Be Taken

In the coming academic year the Consciousness Studies program director, Dennis Klocek, will be invited to attend an Academic Affairs Committee to discuss the future of the program and the possibilities of returning to awarding certificates according to syllabi standards and completion of key assignments.

The Academic Affairs Committee is continuing to discuss a proper strategy for articulating the core credit and the specific courses in the Foundations in Anthroposophy program for admittance into the Waldorf Teacher Training program. Currently the 18-credit value has been agreed upon, but the necessity to complete the whole 32-credit course work and key assignments is still under discussion.

 

Chart 1.5: Enrollment, retention, graduation by cohort…MA in Waldorf Education

 

Context and Explanation

This chart did not place asterisks by Year 4 Focus HS enrolled numbers, nor by Year 5 Waldorf Teacher Prep and Focus HS enrolled numbers. The asterisks identify status of enrollment current or anticipated.

 

Chart 1.6: Certification programs – 2 Year Cohorts

 

Insights from Data

The 2 Year cohort groups show the highest retention and graduation rates. This is primarily due to the fact that the time period is manageable for most demographic groups, particularly the mature students who have families and jobs. The other contributing factor is the Program Director is present at every session and is constantly in a role of mentoring closely all students’ work.

 

Actions To Be Taken

 

The Academic Dean has instituted an on-line communication system between sessions to help retain students’ learning, as well as retaining their status in the program.

 

 

Chart 1.7: Certification programs – 3 Year Cohorts

 

Context and Explanations

In the year of 2007 the program directorship of the Waldorf Teacher Prep program in San Francisco changed. This had quite an impact on the decreased numbers in retention and graduation. This has translated into a rebuilding effort of the San Francisco program, an effort that continues into the present under the new program director.

Under the year 2009 for the Waldorf Teacher Prep program for Los Altos cohort there are 8 retained students, but no graduates. The fact is that all of them are either finishing up key assignments to course work or completing their field experience.

With regard to the foreign languages program the college experienced that many of the students have their schools pay the tuition. Once a student loses their job or transfers schools the funding is put in jeopardy, and thus results in an inability to continue the program. The program was abandoned and in its place a professional development week was offered for foreign language teachers in German, Japanese, and Spanish in the summer of 2008. 32 students attended this event.

 

Insight from Data

The lack of formal documentation of exit interviews of students is not only a loss of an opportunity for institutional learning; it leaves a record that does not necessarily tally with the quality of the program. The absence of a clear marker of expectation for students to finish all assignments to graduate has left the door open for students to leave without graduation. This problem is compounded by the fact that many students are hired to teach in schools before the end of the academic year, and few schools insisted on their completing the program with certificate in hand.

 

Actions To Be Taken

The Academic Affairs Committee is working on a procedure for program directors to follow up on completion of assignments, field experience, and capstone projects. There is also a strategy being formed to assist students in the completion of their work.

The Academic Dean and the President of the college are composing a “White Paper” to present to the Association of Waldorf Schools in North America (AWSNA). It will express the necessity to require Waldorf teachers to fulfill all aspects of their Waldorf Teacher Training (prep) programs and insist upon a certificate as part of the qualifications for employment in an AWSNA sponsored school.

 

Chart 1.8: Certification-Granting   4 Year Cohort

 

Context and Explanations

 

In the Eurythmy program under the cohort 08/09 8 had enrolled. Last year one student was informed that did not have the capacity needed to continue the artistic training, two students transferred to another school, and one student had to withdraw due t health factors. At the start of the year one new student transferred into the cohort and in the beginning of this 2010 semester another student entered the cohort. This brings the total students to 6 and not the 5 that was the number when this data exhibit was requested.

 

Chart 1.9: 4 Year Cohort Group – Rolling Enrollment

 

 

Context and Explanations

 

In cohort 4 and 5 many of the student loss can be attributed to 3 students who lost their jobs due to the Katrina hurricane in New Orleans, 4 students lost positions in schools in Alabama, 1 student died, 3 transferred to other local schools (Portland, Oregon and Austin, Texas), and 4 students to economic hardship.

Although in cohort 6 there are 19 students retained and only 9 graduates, there are 5 students finishing their course work and 5 students finishing their fieldwork.

 

Insights

Within a 4-year period there are potentially many factors that can cause pre-mature and unexpected withdrawals from students.

 

Actions To Be Taken

Many of the strategies previously discussed for retention will also be applied to this issue as well.

 

* With regard to success rates of the college graduates, 65% of the full-time program graduates from 2006 – 2009 are currently in the classroom teaching and more than 80% of the summer program students are already employed in the Waldorf Schools. The college has sponsored annual February conferences intended to serve as professional development for Waldorf teachers. Approximately 400 teachers attend this conference - 200 are graduates of the college. The college has also offered the Art of Teaching courses in the summer, which draws a similar number of participants and graduates. The majority of Waldorf Teachers on the west coast of the United States, and to some beyond, Rudolf Steiner College is referred to as the “mothership”.

 

**All other charts 2.0 – 3.1 are  in order and needing no narrative.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Data Exhibits report narrative on chart 6.3

 

 

 

 

Year 1

8/31/06

Year 2

8/31/07

Year 3

8/31/08

Year 4

8/31/09

Return on net assets

(Net income/total assets at start of year)

 

(1.1%)

7.1%

0

(2.9%)

Net Income Ratio

(Net income/total revenue)

 

2.5%

16.1%

11.8%

(2.4%)

Operating Income Ratio

Income/Expense

 

97.0%

119.3%

101.1%

92.9%

Viability ratio

Net assets/long-term debt

 

No long-term debt

No long-term debt

No long-term debt

No long-term debt

Instructional Expense per Student

Instructional expense/enrolled students per Table 1.1

$3,770.01

($1,078,225 / 286)

 

$3,504.82

($1,093,504 / 312)

$4,147.06

($1,248,625 / 301)

$4,707.39

($1,393,390 / 296)

Net Tuition per Student

Tuition income/enrolled students per Table 1.1

$4,644.35

($1,328,285 / 286)

 

$4,239.62

($1,322,762 / 312)

$4,281.41

($1,288,703 / 301)

$3,919.83

($1,160,290 / 296)

 

1.     In the previous version I made an error in year 1 – the dollars are fine, and I used the correct enrollment number of 286 to do the math, but I then showed enrollment of 377.   My apologies – it made the news seem worse.

 

2.     We are certainly seeing the effects of the recession in enrollment and tuition revenue, with lower enrollment in the last two years and heavier reliance on scholarships.  From Year 2 (when the recession began) to year 4, enrollment is down 5% and tuition is down 15% -- perhaps that is to be expected in the worst recession of the last seventy years, and in fact we may be outperforming other schools in this regard.

 

3.     Instructional expenses have increased from year 2 to year 4 by $300,000, or 27%.  Upon examination I discovered that about 100K, starting in Year 4 was largely for accreditation expenses, including the ALO salary. This should not have been included as an instructional expense.  Also in Year 4 we spent over 100K for additional expenses related to consulting and researching various accreditation options.  Approximately $40,000 was spent on Early Childhood Community Service projects which were not instructional and which were supported by grant funding.  We have not yet updated the data exhibit chart to reflect these.

4. This is a good example of  the use of this data for surfacing improvements that need to be made for reporting purposes. This indicates the possible need for a change in the chart of accounts or class entries in service of this kind of reporting.

 

Chart 1: Admissions, Acceptance, Enrollment

Admissions activities by matriculated program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This data is for full year (annualized)

Year 1

 

Year 2

 

Year 3

 

Year 4

 

Year 5*

 

2005-2006

286

2006-2007

312

2007-2008

301

2008-2009

296

2009-2010

107

Masters degree-granting programs (FOgr/ece, FO Eur, SF, STE, HS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants for admission to Master’s programs

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

8

 

Number of applicants accepted for Master’s programs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

2.36%

8

7.48%

Certification in Waldorf Teacher Preparation (Ftgr/ece, Eury, SF, STE, HS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants

158

 

204

 

176

 

169

 

55

 

    Number of applicants accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

158

55.24%

204

65.38%

176

58.47%

169

57.09%

55

51.40%

Consciousness Studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants

29

 

0

 

28

 

25

 

13

 

Number of applicants accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

29

10.14%

0

 

28

9.30%

25

8.45%

13

12.15%

Remedial Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants

20

 

35

 

14

 

28

 

10

 

Number of applicants accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

20

6.99%

35

11.22%

14

4.65%

28

9.46%

10

9.35%

Anthroposophical Foundations Studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants

23

 

15

 

15

 

13

 

21

 

Number of applicants accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

23

8.04%

15

4.81%

15

4.98%

13

4.39%

21

19.63%

Lifeways and ECISP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of applicants

33

 

45

 

37

 

18

 

 

 

Number of applicants accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

33

11.54%

45

14.42%

37

12.29%

18

6.08%

 

**

    Administration with Spirit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number of applicants

0

 

0

 

14

 

18

 

 

 

    Number accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

 

 

 

 

14

4.65%

18

6.08%

 

**

Waldorf Subject Teachers – Handwork and Foreign Language

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number of applicants

23

 

13

 

17

 

18

 

 

 

    Number accepted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Number enrolled

23

8.04%

13

4.17%

17

5.65%

18

6.08%

 

**

TOTALS

286

100%

312

100%

301

100%

296

100%

107

100%

* most recent year ** 2010 summer enrollment not included

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enrollment, Retention and Graduation

 

*Enrolling in 2010

**Taking Applications

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single Year Residential

Year 1

2005

Year 2

2006

Year 3

2007

Year 4

2008

Year 5

(current)

MA

Degree-granting

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Waldorf Teacher

Prep—Full-time FO Campus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

4

4

7

 

 

Waldorf Teacher Prep—Part-time SF Campus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

14**

 

 

Waldorf Teacher Prep—Eur FO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

Waldorf Teacher

Prep—pt Los Altos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

 

 

 

Waldorf Teacher

Prep—Summer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Focus: Grades

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

Focus: ECE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

Focus: HS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12*

 

 

16**

 

 

Waldorf Teacher Prep—Hybrid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

Waldorf Hybrid Advanced Studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chart 1.7 3 year rolling enrollment

 

Cohort Type = 3 year rolling enrollment

Cohort 03/04

Graduated 2006

 

Cohort 04/05

Graduated 2007

 

Cohort 05/06

Graduated 2008

 

Cohort 06/07

Graduated 2009

 

Cohort 07/08

will graduate 2010

Cohort 08/09

will graduate 2011

Cohort 09/10

will graduate 2012

Matriculated

Certificate-granting

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Enrolled

Retention

Graduated

Waldorf Teacher Prep

Part-time

San Francisco

 

15

10

8

19

9

5

18

11

1

18

9

2

8

5

 

13

13

 

15

 

 

Waldorf Teacher Prep

Part-time

Los Altos

 

6

4

3

6

3

1

9

5

2

13

8

0

*

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

Waldorf Teacher Prep

High School

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5

2

1

23

8

8

13

12

2

20

 

 

 

 

 

Single Subject

Teacher—

Handwork

 

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

11**

7

4

7

 

 

13

 

 

16

 

 

16

 

 

Single Subject

Teacher—

Language

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

12**

 

4

6

 

2

4

 

2

*

 

 

 

 

 

                                               

 

* Program closed—poor enrollment

**New program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FACULTY BY GENDER AND ETHNICITY

( ) = ADJUNCT TOTALS

Year 1

2005-2006

Year 2

2006-2007

Year 3

2007-2008

Year 4

2008-2009

Year 5*

2009-2010

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

Full-Time Faculty  Total

18

14

15

16

16

      Male

7

5

 

6

6

7

      Female

10

9

9

10

10

      White Non-Hispanic

 

 

 

 

 

  Black, Non-Hispanic

1

 

 

 

 

 American Indian / Alaskan Native

 

 

 

 

 

 Asian / Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

 

     Hispanic

 

 

 

 

 

     Other

 

 

 

 

 

Part-Time Faculty

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male

2

4

2

3 (38)

2

Female

1

1

1

       1 (65)

2

White, Non-Hispanic

3

5

3

3(93)

2

Black, Non-Hispanic

 

 

 

(1)

N/A

American Indian / Alaskan Native

 

 

 

 

N/A

Asian / Pacific Islander

 

 

 

(2)

N/A

Hispanic

 

 

 

(3)

N/A

    Other

 

 

 

(1)

N/A

Total (All Faculty)

21

19

18

20

21

Chart 2.0

 

 

Data Exhibits